The Material Foundations of the Modern State and the Rationalization of Iran's Politics and Government in Contemporary History

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 PhD Student of Political Sciences, Dpt. Political Sciences, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Dpt. Political Sciences, Chalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Dpt. Political Sciences, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Professor, Dpt. Political Sciences, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

This article seeks to answer the basic question of how the expansion of the material foundations of the modern state in Iran caused Iran's politics and government to be on the path of rationality for the first time. To answer this question, Max Weber's rationalization theory and descriptive-analytical method have been used. This theory indicated four basic components for the rationalization of politics and government. These components include capitalist economy, modern absolutist government, modern bureaucracy and formal legal system. By applying these components, we found that the government system in Iran was irrational until the renewal, and power was exercised by individuals and was not bound by any contract, organization, or hierarchy. In fact, the power was formed based on personal expediency and profitability and emotional norms. The salient point here is that the necessity of rationalizing Iran's politics and government emerged when the process of modernization in Iran was started by elites from within the government system to obtain a new civilization and harmonize with the evolution of the modern world to establish order in the country which was in line with compensating its backwardness compared to the west. According to this fact it can be said the patterns of the rationalization of Iran's politics and government which are also part of the overall process of modernization. According to the mentioned materials, it can be suggested that Iran's politics and government can become rational when it finds the rationalization components of its real formulation in the sphere of Iranian politics and provides the basis for the transition of Iran's politics and government from autocratic and despotic formulation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References
Abrahamian, Y. (2006), Iran between two revolutions. Translation: Ahmed Golmohammadi, Mohammad Ebrahim Fatahi. Tehran: Nei Publication (In Persian).
 Adamiat, F. (1977), The ideology of Iran's constitutional movement. Tehran: Payam (In Persian).
Adamiat, F. (2012), The idea of ​​progress and the rule of law in the age of Sepahsalar. Tehran: Kharazmi (In Persian).
Afzali, R. (2008), Modern government in Iran. Qom: Mofid (In Persian).
Azghandi, A. (2007), An introduction to the political sociology of Iran. Tehran: Qomes (In Persian).
Bashirieh, H. (2004), Political sociology: the role of social forces in political life. Tehran: Ney (In Persian).
Bashirieh, H. (2006), Reason in politics. Tehran: Negah Moaser (In Persian).
 Bashirieh, H. (2016), Obstacles to political development in Iran. Tehran: Game No (In Persian).
Boomer, F. L. (2008), Major currents in the history of Western thought. Translation: Hossein Bashiriyeh. Tehran, Center for the Recognition of Islam and Iran (In Persian).
Brubaker R. (2015) Limits of rationality, a treatise on Max Weber's social and moral thought. Translation: Shahnaz Mosammaparast. Tehran, Ketab Parse (In Persian).
Dalirpour, P. (2008), "The roots and foundations of the formation of the modern state in Iran" collection of articles on the modern state in Iran. To the attention of Rasool Afzali. Qom: Mofid (In Persian).
 Davoudi, A. M. (1971), Aql in Hikmat Masha from Aristotle to Ibn Sina. Tehran: Dehkhoda (In Persian)
Feenberg, A. (2011), "Modernity, Technology and the Forms of Rationality." Philosophy Compass 6.12 865-873.
 Foroughi, M. A. (2007), The course of wisdom in Europe, fifth edition. Tehran: Nilofar (In Persian).
 Habermas, J. (2015), Theory of communicative action. Translation: Kamal Poladi, Tehran: Center (In Persian).
 Habermas, J. (2022), Towards a rational society. Translation: Ibrahim Scafi. Tehran: Shiraze (In Persian).
Kalberg, S. (1980), "Max Weber's types of rationality: Cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in hi‎story." American journal of sociology 85.5 1145-1179.
 Kasraei, M. S. (1379), The Challenge of Tradition and Modernity in Iran from the Constitution to 1320, Tehran: Markaz (In Persian).
Khorasani, Sharafuddin. (2009), The first Greek philosophers. Tehran: Elmi Farhangi (In Persian).
Rahbari, M. (2012), failed constitution Tehran: Kavir (In Persian).
Sharaf, A. (2015), Historical obstacles to the growth of capitalism in Iran: Qajar period. Tehran: Zamineh (In Persian).
Tabari, E. (1982), Iran in the last two centuries. Tehran: Sherkat Sahami (In Persian).
Tabatabaei, S. J. (2008), The theory of the rule of law in Iran, the foundations of the theory of constitutionalism. Tehran: Sotoudeh (In Persian).
Taylor, Ch. et al. (2008), "Rationality" (collection of articles). Translation: Murad Farhadpour. Organon. Quarterly (In Persian).
Vali, A. (2010), Iran before capitalism. Translation: Hasan Shamsavori. First Edition. Tehran: Markazi (In Persian).
Weber, M. (2010), Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism. Translation: Morteza Saqib Far. Tehran: Jami (In Persian).
International Political Economy Studies
Volume 5, Issue 2
December 2022
Pages 571-595

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 03 June 2021
  • Revise Date: 23 July 2022
  • Accept Date: 27 August 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics