change in the international order from the perspective of realism: another attitude

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 Allameh Tabataba'i University

2 international relations student at Allameh Tabataba'i University

10.22126/ipes.2024.9969.1633

Abstract

In the literature of international relations in the country, realism and theoretical branches related to this school have high acceptance. Different factors have led the country's elites to a kind of interpretation from realism. This article believes that realism includes a diverse set of different theories. The lack of complete knowledge of this set of efforts and the inability to accurately understand the key concepts in this field will lead to a superficial and imprecise interpretation. In this regard, we can point to the inability of this type of understanding to answer the basic and fundamental question of today's international politics, such as change in international order. With this definition, the question which this research is trying to answer is, what capacity does realism have to respond to today's modern issues in the field of evolution in the international order? In response to this question, it can be said that Robert Gilpin's interpretation of realism based on hegemonic rotation (in international politics) along with hegemonic stability (in international political economy) provides a suitable approach for presenting a relatively obvious explanation of this issue (evolution in the international political economy order). In this regard, Solow's economic model, which is used in order to strengthen, enrich and attempt to quantify Gilpin's interpretation of realism, provides a base for a better explanation of the period of transition and transformation in the international order. The method of this research is deductive and the research type of this research is fundamental, case study and static. What is investigated in this research is the utilize of Robert Gilpin's theories in the fields of international politics and international political economy, which has been strengthened and enriched by Robert Solow's economic model to better explain the period of transition and evolution in the international political economy order.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

منابع
تفضلی، فریدون (1381). اقتصاد کلان نظریه‌ها و سیاست‌های اقتصادی. چاپ سیزدهم. تهران: نشر نی.
ساندلین، بو و تراتوین، هانس میکائیل (1400). تاریخ مختصر اندیشه‌ها اقتصادی. ترجمۀ حمیدرضا ارباب. چاپ ششم. تهران: نشر نی.
کیوهن، رابرت و نای، جوزف (1400). از وابستگی متقابل تا حکمرانی جهانی. ترجمۀ وحید بزرگی. چاپ اول. تهران: نشر قومس.
گریفیتس، مارتین و روچ، استیون و سولومون، اسکات (1398). پنجاه متفکر روابط بین‌الملل. ترجمۀ علیرضا طیب. چاپ پنجم. تهران: نشر نی.
گیلپین، رابرت (1401). اقتصاد سیاسی جهانی. ترجمۀ مهدی میرمحمدی. چاپ اول. تهران: انتشارات پژوهشکدۀ مطالعات راهبردی.
نیلی، مسعود (1398). مبانی اقتصاد. چاپ یازدهم. تهران: نشر نی.
والتز، کنث (1400). انسان، دولت و جنگ. ترجمۀ محمدرضا رستمی. چاپ دوم. تهران: نشر ثالث.
References
Biden orders ban on certain US tech investments in China. (2023). Reuters. from https:// www.reuters.com
Brooks, S. G. (1997). Dueling Realisms. International Organization, 51 (3), 445-477. doi: 10.1162/ 002081897550429
Buzan, B. (2016). People, States & Fear. ECPR Press.
Caverzasi, E., & Godin, A. (2015). Post-Keynesian stock-flow-consistent modelling: A survey. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39 (1), 157-187. DOI: doi: 10.1093/cje/beu021
Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Gilpin, R. (2022). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Translated by Mehdi Mirmohamadi. Tehran: Research Institute of Startegic Studies (In Persian).
Gilpin, R. (1984). The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization, 38(2), 287–304. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300026710
Gilpin, R., & Gilpin, J. M. (1987). The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton University Press.
Griffiths, M., Roach, S., & Solomon, S. (2019). Fifty Key Thinkers in International Relations. Translated by Alireza Tayeb. Tehran: Nei Publications (In Persian).
Guzzini, S. (2013). Power, Realism and Constructivism. Routledge.
Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (2021). From Interdependence To Global Governance. Translated by Vahid Bozorgi. Tehran: Ghoomes Publications (In Persian).
Milner, H. V. (1998). International Political Economy: Beyond Hegemonic Stability. Foreign Policy, 110, 112-123. doi: 10.2307/1149280
Nili, M. (2019). Basics of economics. Tehran: Ney publication (In Persian).
Richardson, J. L. (1991). Paul Kennedy and international relations theory: A comparison with Robert Gilpin. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 45 (1), 70-77. doi: 10.1080/ 10357719108445050
Sandelin, B., & Trautwein, H.-M. (2021). A Short History of Economic Thought. Translated by Hamidreza Arbab. Tehran: Nei Publications (In Persian).
Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (1), 65-94. doi: 10.2307/1884513
Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3), 312-320. doi: 10.2307/1926047
Spiezio, K. E. (1990). British Hegemony and Major Power War, 1815-1939: An Empirical Test of Gilpin’s Model of Hegemonic Governance. International Studies Quarterly, 34 (2), 165–181. doi: 10.2307/2600707
Tafazoli, F. (2002). Macroeconomics, economic theories and policies. Tehran: Ney publication (In Persian).
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Waltz, K. N. (2021). Man, the State, and War. Translated by Mohamdreza Rostami. Tehran: Saless Publications (In Persian).
Wohlforth, W. C. (2011). Gilpinian Realism and International Relations. International Relations, 25 (4), 499-511. doi: 10.1177/0047117811411742
 
 
 
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 December 2023
  • Revise Date: 26 March 2024
  • Accept Date: 22 April 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics