Artificial Intelligence Impacts on the Capacity of International Political Economy Actors

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 Department of International Relations, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D Candidate of International Relations, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), one of the most significant technological advancements of the current century, has profoundly and broadly impacted various aspects of international political economy (IPE). A key impact is the fundamental transformation of actor capacity within this domain. This study aims at examining the impact of AI on the capacity of IPE actors. The main question is: How has AI altered actor capacity in the international political economy, and what implications does this hold for traditional structures of power and agency? The research hypothesizes that AI is fundamentally shifting actor capacity from human to post-human (i.e., machines and AI-driven systems). The research employs a qualitative and descriptive-analytical method, with data collected through investigating existing literature, scholarly articles, key reports, and case analyses. The findings reveal that AI has generated novel post-human capacities for actors that were previously nonexistent. These impacts include the diminishing role of states as main traditional actors, the empowerment of transnational institutions and multinational corporations, and the emergence of a new environment for intelligent action. In conclusion, AI has empowered actors with improved and rapid decision-making capabilities in complex IPE through enhancing data processing precision, speed, and analytical power, which is particularly evident in areas such as international trade, economic policymaking, and global crisis management.

Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI), as one of the most prominent technologies of the current century, has transitioned from theoretical concepts into an effective reality in international interactions. One area directly impacted by this technology is international political economy (IPE), specifically the capacity of national(state) and transnational actors. Historically, agency in IPE relied on human capabilities and traditional tools; however, given the expansion of AI, activities can now be performed through intelligent systems. This evolution raises questions about the changing nature of actors and the transfer of power from human to post-human actors. AI, with its ability to analyze big data and facilitate decision-making, has propelled the capacity of these actors into a new phase. In this regard, the research aims to investigate the impacts of AI on the capacity of actors in IPE. The research question is: What impact does AI have on the capacity of actors in IPE? The hypothesis is that AI is leading to a fundamental transformation in actor capacity, such that the nature of agency is shifting from human to post-human (machines and AI-based systems).

Theoretical Framework

The conceptual analysis of this research is based on two approaches: first, AI as an independent post-human actor, and second, AI as an assistant enhancing actor capacity. In the first approach, AI itself could be recognized as an actor, while in the second approach, AI is a tool. This research, building upon the second approach, presents a conceptual model of the impact of artificial intelligence on actors of IPE, signifying a transition from the era of realist state-centrism and liberal transnationalism to an era of state-evasion. According to this analytical model, the transition from the "pre-AI era" to the "post-AI era" is being established through the integration of AI into the structure of actors and the creation of new capacities for them.

Methodology

This research employs a qualitative, descriptive-analytical method. Relevant data were gathered and examined through a study of existing sources, including articles, reports, and case analyses. A comparative method was also utilized to analyze the differences in actor capacity between the pre- and post-AI eras. Specifically, the traditional human decision-making process was compared with new decision-making models based on machine learning algorithms, data mining, and predictive analytics.

Results & Discussion

To study systematically, this research utilized two key indicators: the impact of AI on decision-making processes in IPE, and the impact of AI on the speed and effectiveness of decision-making. Here, the findings indicate a fundamental transformation in actor capacity. The most significant areas impacted by artificial intelligence include:

Intelligent Decision-Making: AI is changing the seven-stage human decision-making processes. Instead of manual and limited human analysis, intelligent tools analyze vast amounts rapidly, providing diverse options to decision-makers.
Increased Speed of Decision-Making: One of AI's achievements is its significant acceleration of the decision-making process and increased accuracy in its execution.
Formation of New Technological Competitive Blocs: A new competition is emerging among states, tech-companies, transnational institutions, and non-state actors on data dominance, investment in AI, new technology production, and the setting of governance standards.
Shift in Global Power Structure: AI is diminishing the role of states as the main traditional actors while strengthening transnational actors such as multinational corporations. These developments are redefining power structures and have led to the formation of competitive regional blocs (e.g., China, the U.S., Europe, Asia).
Dynamic New Environment to Act: Entry into the smart environment of the global economy requires understanding the complexities arising from AI and optimizing its use in areas such as international trade, economic growth, labor market changes, and global governance. This new environment has elevated agency to a post-human level through combining technological, political, and economic factors.


Conclusions

This research confirms that AI is fundamentally shifting the capacity of actors from human to post-human (AI-based systems). This transformation is driven by AI's central role in decision-making, data analysis, wealth generation, and governance. Consequently, transnational actors have leveraged AI to significantly strengthen their economic and political positions, in some cases even gaining dominance over national actors. Conversely, states are now compelled to rapidly develop their technological infrastructure and formulate new policies to adapt to this global "smart" environment. This transfer of power from states to intelligent non-state actors highlights an urgent need to re-evaluate traditional concepts of sovereignty, international economics, and politics. In conclusion, AI has not merely altered the tools of decision-making; it is establishing the groundwork for a new global order where data, algorithms, and speed are the primary determinants of power. These profound transformations necessitate the establishment of new regulatory frameworks, foster global cooperation in technology governance, and require a critical re-evaluation of national development strategies to both harness AI's benefits and mitigate its potential negative consequences.
Ethical Considerations
Not applicable
Funding
Not applicable
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abasov, A. (2024). Challenges and obstacles to recognizing Artificial Intelligence as a new economic actor. E3S Web of Conferences, 474, 02005–02005. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/ 202447402005
Arsenault, A. C., & Kreps, S. E. (2022). AI and International Politics. The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.49
Arts, B. (2003). Non-state actors in global governance: Three faces of power, P.5, Www.econstor.eu.http://hdl.handle.net/10419/85112
Baele, S. J., Bukhari, I., Whyte, C., Cuomo, S., Jensen, B., Payne, K., & Garcia, E. V. (2024). AI IR: Charting International Relations in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. International Studies Review, 26(2). doi: 10.1093/isr/viae013
Barkin, J. Samuel, and Bruce Cronin. (1994). The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations. International Organization, 48(1), 110-111, doi: 10.1017/s0020818300000837
Bate, A. (2024, November 20). Watch moment AI robot leads revolution as it convinces bot army to “quit your jobs” before leading them out... The Sun. https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/ 31823936/ai-robot-leads-revolution-quit-jobs/
Brass, I., & Hornsby, D. J. (2018). Digital Technological Innovation and the International Political Economy. The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary International Political Economy, 615–631. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-45443-0_38
Bughin, J., & Seong, J. (2018, October 17). How competition is driving AI’s rapid adoption| McKinsey. Www.mckinsey.com. https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/overview/in-the-news/how -competition-is-driving-ais-rapid-adoption
Copeland, B. (2023, April 24). Artificial intelligence (AI) | Definition, Examples, Types, Applications, Companies, & Facts. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/ technology/artificial-intelligence
Dauvergne, P. (2020). Is Artificial Intelligence Greening Global Supply chains? Exposing the Political Economy of Environmental Costs. Review of International Political Economy, 29(3), 1–23. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2020.1814381
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making in the Era of Big Data – evolution, Challenges and Research Agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48(1), 63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
Gao, Y. (2023). Environmental Regulation of Transnational Corporations by Host Countries. Highlights in Business Economics and Management, 16, 415–421. doi: 10.54097/hbem.v16i. 10608
Gerlich, M. (2024). Brace for Impact: Facing the AI Revolution and Geopolitical Shifts in a Future Societal Scenario for 2025–2040. Societies, 14(9), 180. doi: 10.3390/soc14090180
Gilpin, R. (1975). U. S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment (P. 43). New York: Basic Books.
Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy: understanding the international economic order (P. 3). Princeton University Press.
Giordano, C., Brennan, M., Mohamed, B., Rashidi, P., Modave, F., & Tighe, P. (2021). Accessing artificial intelligence for clinical decision-making. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3(2), 645232. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.645232
Gonzáles, J. R. (2023). Implications of AI innovation on economic growth: a panel data study. Journal of Economic Structures, 12(1). doi: 10.1186/s40008-023-00307-w
Graz, J.-C., Kessler, O., & Kunz, R. (2019). International Political Economy (IPE) meets International Political Sociology (IPS). International Relations, 33(4), 586–594. doi: 10.1177/0047117819885161
Gualdi, F., & Cordella, A. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making: the question of Accountability. doi: 10.24251/hicss.2021.281
Horowitz, M. C. (2020). Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics? Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 385-400. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032725
Jackson, R., Georg Sørensen, & Jørgen Møller. (2018). International Political Economy: Classical Theories. Oxford University Press EBooks, 1. doi: 10.1093/hepl/9780198803577.003.0006
Kwilinski, A., Dalevska, N., & V. Dementyev, V. (2022). Metatheoretical Issues of the Evolution of the International Political Economy. ProQuest, 124. doi: 10.3390/jrfm15030124
Łabędzki, R. (2024). Decision making aided by Artificial Intelligence. E-Mentor, 106(4), 71–78. doi: 10.15219/em106.1679
Loftus, T. J., Tighe, P. J., Filiberto, A. C., Efron, P. A., Brakenridge, S. C., Mohr, A. M., Rashidi, P., Upchurch, G. R., Jr, & Bihorac, A. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making. JAMA Surgery, 155(2), 148–158. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917
Meleouni, C., & Efthymiou, I. P. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and its Impact in International Relations. Journal of Politics and Ethics in New Technologies and AI, 2(1), e35803–e35803. doi: 10.12681/jpentai.35803
Miss. Tehreen Khot, & Mr. Shailesh Sutar. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Innovation. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 259-263. doi: 10.48175/ijarsct-8152
Oatley, T. (2015). International Political Economy, pp. 1-12, Routledge. doi: 10.4324/ 9781315630878.
Osei Bonsu, K. (2020). Turbulence on the Global Economy Influenced by Artificial Intelligence and Foreign Policy Inefficiencies. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, Institute for Research and European Studies - Bitola, 2, 113-122. doi: 10.47305/jlia2020113ob
Petru-Dan KOVACI. (2024). Threat Actors Seeking to Exploit AI Capabilities., Types and their Goals. Strategic Impact, 89(4), 53-63. doi: 10.53477/1842-9904-23-21
Phillips, T. (2019, February 21). What data dominance really means, and how countries can compete. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2019/02/what-data-dominance-really-means-and-how-countries-can-compete/
Phillips-Wren, G., & Jain, L. (2006). Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4252, 531–536. doi: 10.1007/11893004_69
Pilly Ashritha, & Patlolla Sathvika Reddy. (2023). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Management Decision-Making. International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research, 01(02), 10–18. doi: 10.60072/ijabmr.2023.v1i02.002
Prasanth, A., Vadakkan, D. J., Surendran, P., & Thomas, B. (2023). Role of Artificial Intelligence and Business Decision Making. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(6). doi: 10.14569/ijacsa.2023.01406103
Prokhazka, H., & Melnyk, O. (2023). Implementation of AI in international law and administrative law (in the context of human rights protection). Revista Amazonia Investiga, 12(67), 66–77. doi: 10.34069/ai/2023.67.07.6
Radoslav Baltezarević. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on the global economy. Megatrend Revija, 20(3), 13–24. doi: 10.5937/megrev2303013b
Solos, W. K., & Leonard, J. (2022). On the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Economy. Science Insights, 41(1), 551–560. doi: 10.15354/si.22.re066
Steele, K., & Orri, S. H. (2015). Decision Theory (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Stanford.edu. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/decision-theory/
Takeaways, K. (2024). Non-State Actors Playing Greater Roles in Governance and International Affairs Approved for Public Release by DNI Haines on 18. https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/ documents/assessments/NICM-Non-State-Actors_23-01637_05-18-24_.pdf
Tianyu, X. (2024). Impact of next-generation Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) on international relations. Journal of Regional and International Competitiveness, 5(1), 64–69. doi: 10.52957/2782-1927-2024-5-1-64-69
Vijayakumar, A. (2022). Potential impact of artificial intelligence on the emerging world order. F1000Research, 11, 1186. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.124906.2
Vyacheslav Makedon, & Nataliia Voloshko. (2023). The Influence of Transnational Corporations on the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals. Ìnfrastruktura Rinku, 70. doi: 10.32782/infrastruct70-2
Wang, J., Yang, J., & Zhao, Z. (2024). The Analysis of Large High-tech Corporations’ Governance: Taking Microsoft as an Example. Highlights in Business Economics and Management, 24, 489–493. doi: 10.54097/mbag0781
Waza, A. M. (2024). Examining the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Decision Making Processes in Governance. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Social Sciences, 2(7), 1139–1150. doi: 10.59890/ijatss.v2i7.2319
Youde, J. (2019). States, Nonstate Actors, and Economics in Global Health Governance. Oxford University Press EBooks. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190900571.013.39