Structural Challenges to the Development of Iran's Digital Economy

Document Type : Research

Authors

1 Full Professor of International Political Economy, Department of Global and Regional Politics, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 M.A. Student in International Political Economy, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The digital economy, as one of the primary drivers of economic transformation, provides unique capacities for enhancing productivity, reducing transaction costs, creating added value, and reshaping market structures. Meanwhile, developing countries, particularly Iran, despite possessing human, technological, and demographic advantages, face multiple and complex obstacles in optimizing these capacities. The present study, drawing upon the theoretical framework of Neoliberal International Political Economy(IPE) and employing a quantitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach, comprehensively examines the structural, institutional, and policy challenges affecting the development of Iran's digital economy. Research findings indicate that the persistence of state-centric interventions, monopolistic structures, non-transparent policymaking, the absence of independent regulatory institutions, and international sanctions are the most significant deterrents to realizing fundamental neoliberal components, such as genuine privatization, deregulation, attracting foreign capital, and integration into global economic chains. The findings suggest that Iran's digital ecosystem, rather than following a targeted, policy-driven transformation model, has primarily experienced episodic growth in reaction to external crises and emergency conditions, including sanctions, the COVID-19 crisis, and inflationary pressures. Weaknesses in communication infrastructure, disruptions in data governance, limited access to emerging technologies, and an uncertain investment climate have led to reduced competitiveness of the digital ecosystem and human capital flight. In such a context, the private sector, owing to its structural dependency on state and quasi-state institutions, has also failed to play an effective role in the sustainable development of this domain. Accordingly, the research concludes that sustainable transformation in Iran's digital economy necessitates redefining the role of the state, reducing institutional stewardship, ensuring regulatory transparency, and strengthening and expanding international cooperation. Only through the acceptance of market economy logic and the implementation of neoliberal principles within an indigenized framework can Iran's digital economy be expected to move towards global competitiveness and inclusive growth.

Introduction

The digital economy, as one of the primary drivers of contemporary economic transformations, provides unique capacities for enhancing productivity, reducing transaction costs, and creating added value. In this context, Iran, despite possessing considerable potential-such as a young population, a high ranking in technical and engineering graduates, and high mobile penetration-faces multiple and complex obstacles in optimizing these capacities. Structural barriers, inefficient policymaking, extensive state interventions, international sanctions, and restrictive regulatory policies have severely slowed the development of this sector. This research addresses the main question: Given the high importance of the digital economy in enhancing GDP, why has Iran's digital economy failed to achieve success commensurate with its potential? The research hypothesis posits that a combination of extensive state interventions, inefficient regulatory policies, infrastructural limitations, and sanctions has been the most significant barrier. Furthermore, existing progress has not been based on targeted planning but has occurred mainly in reaction to emergency conditions, such as the COVID-19 crisis, sanctions, and inflationary pressures.

Theoretical Framework

The present study is grounded in the theoretical framework of Neoliberal International Political Economy(IPE). This theory, rooted in the principles of economic liberalism, emphasizes the free market, reduced state intervention, privatization, and deregulation. It posits that minimizing the state's role and strengthening competition leads to optimal resource allocation, increased productivity, and sustainable growth. This framework provides an analytical tool to assess the impact of economic policies on digital economy development. In this research, the theory is used to causally analyze the relationship between the state-centric structure of Iran's economy and the inefficiencies of its digital ecosystem. In other words, the paper analyzes how the absence of fundamental neoliberal components(such as genuine privatization, deregulation, attracting foreign capital, and integration into the global economy) has hindered the realization of Iran's digital economy potential.

Research Methodology

This study employs a quantitative method integrated with a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through library resources, official domestic and international reports, and policy analyses. Data analysis was conducted through theoretical deduction, structural explanation, and examination of the correlation between key variables(including state interventions, sanctions, infrastructure quality, and private sector performance). It is noteworthy that the quantitative method herein is not solely focused on statistical calculations; rather, by focusing on causal analysis and data-driven interpretation, it serves to precisely explain the institutional, legal, and policy processes affecting digital economy development.

Discussion and Findings

The research findings indicate that the development of Iran's digital economy faces deep structural, institutional, and policy barriers that are in direct conflict with the principles of the neoliberal theoretical framework.
     State Intervention and Private Sector Weakness: The most significant barrier is the persistence of state-centric interventions, monopolistic structures, non-transparent policymaking, and the absence of independent regulatory institutions. Contrary to the neoliberal model, a genuine and competitive private sector has not formed in Iran. The existing private sector, due to its structural dependency on state and quasi-state institutions and the monopolistic advantages enjoyed by quasi-state companies, has failed to play an effective role in sustainable development.
4.1 Infrastructural Challenges and the Internet
Findings confirm severe weakness in the communication infrastructure. Iran ranks 102nd in the ICT infrastructure index and holds a critical position of 211th out of 237 countries in average internet speed. This weakness, combined with extensive filtering policies-which contradict the principle of free data flow in the neoliberal model-has resulted in massive losses(estimated at $1.5 billion ) and has harmed 95% of online businesses.
4.2 Sanctions and Policy Instability
International sanctions, by blocking the exchange of technology, knowledge, and foreign capital, have been a primary obstacle to Iran's integration into global economic chains. Domestically, an uncertain investment climate, resulting from complex and variable regulations, policy instability, and a lack of legal transparency, has sharply increased the risks of economic activity.
4.3 Reactive Growth and Capital Flight
The findings support the research hypothesis: Iran's digital ecosystem, rather than following a targeted, policy-driven transformation model, has primarily experienced episodic and emergency-driven growth in reaction to external crises(such as sanctions, the COVID-19 crisis, and inflationary pressures). This situation, alongside other barriers, has led to reduced ecosystem competitiveness and intensified human capital flight.

Conclusion

The research concludes that the current development path of Iran's digital economy is in clear conflict with the fundamental principles of the neoliberal approach(including privatization, free competition, deregulation, and global integration). The primary barriers identified include extensive state intervention and monopolistic structures, an uncertain investment climate, and an effective disconnection from global chains due to sanctions. Accordingly, sustainable transformation in Iran's digital ecosystem necessitates a redefinition of the state's role, a reduction in institutional stewardship(tasaddigari), regulatory transparency, the strengthening of communication and technological infrastructure, and, finally, the expansion of targeted international engagement. This study emphasizes that only through the acceptance of market economy logic and the implementation of neoliberal principles within an indigenized framework can Iran's digital economy be expected to move onto a path of global competitiveness and inclusive growth.
Ethical Considerations
Not applicable
Funding
Not applicable
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aghazadeh, M. (2014). International sanctions and their impacts on Iran’s economy. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 6(2), 25-41.
Astrov, V., Ghodsi, M., Grieveson, R., & Stehrer, R. (2018). The Iranian economy: Challenges and opportunities (WiiW Research Report No. 429). The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies(wiiw). https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/204201/1/wiiw-research-rep-429.pdf
Atwood, B. (2025). Artificial intelligence in Iran: National narratives and material realities. Iranian Studies, 1-18. doi: 10.1017/irn.2024.63
Barefoot, K., Curtis, D., Jolliff, W., Nicholson, J. R., & Omohundro, R. (2018). Defining and measuring the digital economy. Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.bea.gov/system/files/papers/WP2018-4.pdf
Bayat, Z. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on the digital economy. National Conference on Interdisciplinary Research in Management and Humanities (In Persian).
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W.W. Norton & Company.
Bureau of Economic Analysis (2022). Digital economy infographic. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/digital-economy-infographic-2022.png
Center for International Science and Technology Cooperation (2024). Science, technology and innovation in Iran: A brief review. https://cistc.ir/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Final-Iran-at-a-Glance-2024-1.pdf
China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (2023, November). White paper on the digital economy(2023). https://www.caict.ac.cn/english/research/whitepapers/202311/ P020231101476013122093.pdf
Delivery Hero (2024, February 8). "Delivery Hero publishes preliminary results for Q4 2023". https://www.deliveryhero.com/newsroom/preliminary-results-q4-2023/
Dube Williams, L. (2021). Concepts of digital economy and Industry 4.0 in intelligent and information systems. International Journal of Intelligent Networks, 2, 122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijin.2021.09.002
Dumitra, E. (2023). AI - The new player in digital economy. In Geopolitical perspectives and technological challenges for sustainable growth in the 21st century(pp. 877-886). doi: 10.2478/9788367405546-081
Economic Activists Forum (2022). The cost of internet filtering in Iran. [Telegram post]. https://t.me/iran_economy_online/18899 (In Persian).
Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and freedom(40th Anniversary edition). University of Chicago Press.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
IDEO (2023). Iran's Digital Economy Outlook: 2023. Citna. Retrieved from https://www.citna.ir/ sites/default/files/files/attachment/citna/IDEO%20-Compressed.pdf
Institute for Trade Studies and Research.(2022). Assessment and analysis of Iran’s economic competitiveness gap (In Persian).
Katz, R. (2017). Social and economic impact of digital transformation on the economy. GSR-17 Discussion paper. Geneva: ITU.
Kiyanifar, A., Baghani, A., & Behjatifard, H. (2023). Integrated financial and tax systems in Iran’s digital economy. National Conference on Emerging Research in Accounting, Finance, Management, and Economics with a Focus on Innovation Ecosystem Development (In Persian).
Koch, T., & Windsperger, J. (2017). Seeing through the network: Competitive advantage in the digital economy. Journal of Organization Design, 6(6). doi: 10.1186/s41469-017-0016-z
Lowndes, V., Marsh, D., Stoker, G (2023). Theory and methods in political science(Trans. Amir Mohammad Hajiyousefi). Tehran: Strategic Studies Research Institute.(New edition, first printing) (In Persian).
Madani, K. (2021). Have International Sanctions Impacted Iran’s Environment?. World, 2(2), 231‑252. doi: 10.3390/world2020015
Moghadam, M. R. (2020). "Digital economy and its challenges in Iran". Sixth International Conference on Financial Management, Commerce, Banking, Economics, and Accounting, Tehran (In Persian).
Moradi, M. A., & Hedayati, M. R. (2018). A developmental model for Iran's transition to a digital economy. Economic Research Journal, 18(68), 219-251 (In Persian).
Mousazadeh Mousavi, S. M., & Hamtan AtarBashi, A. (2020). Digital economy(Part 4): An analysis of the current status of Iran's digital economy ecosystem. Tehran: Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (In Persian).
Mousazadeh Mousavi, S. M., Bagheri, A., & Adabi Firouzjai, M. (2018). Digital economy(Part 1): Dimensions and characteristics. Tehran: Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (In Persian).
Mousazadeh Mousavi, S. M., Bagheri, A., & Adabi Firouzjai, M. (2019). Digital economy(Part 2): The share of digital economy in the global economy and development requirements. Tehran: Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (In Persian).
Nafarlisaleh, N., & Abbasi, E. (2023). Identifying strengths and weaknesses in the performance of neobanks in Iran. Dynamic Management and Business Analytics Quarterly, 2(1), 1-17 (In Persian).
Nazarov, R. I. (2022). The digital economy today. Academicia Globe: Inderscience Research, 3(10), 198-203. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N75A6
Popova, L., & Rasoulinezhad, E. (2016). Have sanctions modified Iran’s trade policy? An evidence of Asianization and De-Europeanization through the gravity model. Economies, 4(4), 24. doi: 10.3390/economies4040024
Rastegari, Sh., Babaeifard, A., & Niazi, M. (224). Stakeholders’ lived experience of the privatization process in Iran. Applied Sociology, 35(2), 69-100 (In Persian).
Reshchikov, O. (2022). Digitalization processes in Iran during the period of sanctions. Asia and Africa Today, 2022(8), 26-33. doi: 10.31857/S032150750021324-8
Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. W.W. Norton & Company.
Salahvarzi, H. (2025). Total nominal value of Iran’s e-commerce financial transactions. [Post on X]. https://x.com/i/status/1870170445200199886?mx=2 (In Persian).
Samuel, K. C. (2020). Neoliberalism, digital communication technologies and the cultural and creative industries. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities. https://journals.aijr.org/ index. php/ajss/article/download/2037/254
Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton & Company.
TechRasa. (2022). The size of the Instagram product marketplace and the social commerce industry in Iran (In Persian).
Tehran E-Commerce Association. (2023). Internet quality in Iran: An analytical report on disruptions, restrictions, and internet speed in Iran (In Persian).
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development(UNCTAD).(2021). Digital economy report 2021. https://unctad.org/webflyer/digital-economy-report-2021
West, M., & Ballam, D. (2018). An introduction to international political economy(Trans. Ahmad Saei & Abdolmajid Seifi). Tehran: Qomess (In Persian).
World Intellectual Property Organization (2024). Iran(Islamic Republic of) ranking in the Global Innovation Index 2024. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/gii-ranking/2024/ir.pdf
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.